Monday, 28 January 2013

Toon Noir (25 Years of Who Framed Roger Rabbit)

With his upcoming film, Flight, looking towards a critical and commercial success, director Robert Zemeckis is seemingly on his way to a comeback. Not too long ago, a film he produced by the name of Mars Needs Moms (2011) performed disastrously at the box office, in amongst the hyper-realistic motion-capture CGI. Zemeckis’ previous products in this field, Polar Express (2004) and A Christmas Carol (2009) didn’t meet the same kind of fate (well, Christmas Carol never did make back much, comparatively), but are hardly universally embraced either.

 

So where did it begin? You have to cast all the way back to the 1980s.

 

Coming into the business as a sort of protégée to Steven Spielberg, Robert Zemeckis hit the big-time as a director in the mid-80s with two solid hits; 1984’s Romancing The Stone (which capitalised on Spielberg’s success with Raiders Of The Lost Ark (1981)) and then a year later with Back To The Future. For Zemeckis’ next feature film, he cast Bob Hoskins, Charles Fleischer, Kathleen Turner (from Romancing The Stone) and Christopher Lloyd (from Back To The Future) in an adaptation of Gary K Wolf’s story, Who Censored Roger Rabbit?, this time retitled as Who Framed Roger Rabbit (the lack of a question mark in the title is the result of Hollywood superstition as it’s believed film’s with question marks in the title never do well).

 

Who Framed Roger Rabbit is really more the story of Eddie Valiant (Hoskins) an alcoholic private eye in Los Angeles in 1947. His brother, Teddy (Eugene Guiterrez), died during an investigation in Toon Town; a neighbourhood inhabited by cartoon characters (or Toons). This not only accounts for Eddie’s alcoholism but also his prejudice towards Toons. When one of the most famous Toons, Roger Rabbit (Fleischer) discovers his wife Jessica (Turner/singing voice Amy Irving) playing “pattycake” (actual pattycake, by the way, not a euphemism) with industrialist Marvin Acme (Stubby Kaye), Roger flies off the handle; which doesn’t look so good when Acme turns up murdered and Eddie is assigned to the case.

 

On the one hand, Who Framed Roger Rabbit is an homage to classic American animation, mainly Disney and Warner Brothers, but also nods to other studios, particularly the Fleischer Brothers. On the other hand, the film is also a tribute to Film Noir. A style of film mainly from the 1940s and 50s, stereotypically involving hard-boiled private eyes, slinky femme fatales and dangerous villains in rain-soaked urban streets almost always in black-and-white.

 

The animation is probably what stands out in most people’s minds. This was by no means the first film to mix live-action actors and animated characters. Such ideas go back decades before this film. But it was done on a scale that was completely unprecedented. Robert Zemeckis may have been the credited director, but perhaps a large share of credit for the film creatively must also go to animation director, Richard Williams. Williams is a particular hero for many animation aficionados. His work may be very eclectic in styles, but it’s always clear when watching his work that you are watching a master perfectionist. His feel for movement and realism is unsurpassed, even to the extent that it’s his downfall. The film that got him noticed for his was his pet project, The Thief And The Cobbler. A work that he started in the 1960s and, owing to limited means and his painstaking attention to detail and quality, was still being worked by the time of Roger Rabbit, some twenty-five years later. The success led to Cobbler being given more time by major studios, only for Williams to be kicked off his own film for taking too much time and the film to be pushed out uncaringly with generic music and rushed animation. Search for the “Recobbled Cut” of The Thief And The Cobbler online and treat yourself to a good look of what might have been one of the greatest animated films ever made.

Who Framed Roger Rabbit  is covered in animation, some of it in staggering quality. The famous “piano duel” between Daffy and Donald Duck is a remarkable example of the two melding mediums of live-action and animation (even the reflections of their “hands” on the glossed piano surface are meticulously animated) and pretty much any iconic cartoon character turns up (the film marks the first simultaneous on-screen appearance of both Bugs Bunny and Mickey Mouse) along with some interesting new characters. Roger Rabbit combines the slapstick humour (and species) of Bugs with the child-like lovability (and clothing) of Mickey. A truly composite cartoon hero, whilst his wife Jessica may be the icon (for better or worse) of animated sex symbols, being a wildly exaggerated take on Noir Femme Fatales (her legendary entrance, an homage to Rita Hayworth in Gilda (1946))

On the other hand, Who Framed Roger Rabbit is also an exploration of America (especially LA and Hollywood) in the 40s. Eddie’s prejudice towards Toons seems almost akin at times to racism, still widespread in America at the time and a  theme explored in other post-modern takes on Film Noir (such as Barton Fink (1990)) and the film also alludes to LA’s famously crowded modern transportation system. At the start, Eddie, whilst stealing a ride on the back of a tram, remarks the city has the best public transport in the world. Meanwhile, the villainous Judge Doom (Christopher Lloyd, performing a million miles away from Back To The Future’s kindly but eccentric “Doc” Emmett Brown) gives a brilliant monologue about his dream of a future with freeways filled end-to-end with fast-food stop-overs and gas stations (a look into transport’s future) “My god, it’ll be beautiful!”.

 

Whilst the idea that animated films, especially American ones, aren’t just made for children to enjoy may be scoffed at, Who Framed Roger Rabbit is one of the few classics where this belief is generally upheld. Smart, funny and interesting, the film is credited with helping to bring about a second golden age for American animation, both for Disney (Who would produce a string of critically acclaimed animated super-hits for much of the 90s) and for Warner Brothers (Spielberg would go on to further his love for animation, producing nostalgic animated TV shows, such as Tiny Toon Adventures, Animaniacs and Taz-Mania) and its ability to inspire such greatness is not undeserved.

Sunday, 27 January 2013

FILM OF THE WEEK: THE PRINCESS BRIDE (1987)

Rob Reiner's cult classic is probably the best of the glut of fantasy films to spill out in the mid-to-late-80s (Legend (1984), Ladyhawke (1985), Labyrinth (1986), Willow (1988)) its also uproariously funny with an all-star cast, a screenplay filled with memorable quotes ("Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.") and its share of high-adventure and romance. Although the still good Shrek (2000) may have slightly taken some of the film's unique place in style, this is still a superior picture.

THE LAST STAND REVIEW

The latest Schwarzenneger movie offers plenty of action, but the film is woefully and dismally stupid. Yes, with Arnie that's not unexpected (in fact, its often part of the appeal) but with the exception of a couple of strong sequences, The Last Stand is pretty wobbly to say the least. Any (and I mean ANY) films you want me to review? Just drop a comment and I'll see what I can do.

Saturday, 26 January 2013

ZERO DARK THIRTY REVIEW

From the director of The Hurt Locker (2009), comes this real-life war thriller, carrying with it Hurt Locker's style, with a slightly less documentary feel which aids the production. Despite reports to the contrary, this film doesn't glorify torture (in fact, it isn't afraid to question the morality of the US military or government on this and other matters). This moral ambiguity results in some not very well-defined supporting characters, but the film is extremely tense end-to-end. If there are any films you'd like to me review, plese leave a comment.

Sunday, 20 January 2013

FILM OF THE WEEK: E.T: THE EXTRA TERRESTRIAL

(1982) (U) Originally envisioned as a film called "Night Skies", a sci-fi/horror film, director Steven Spielberg would instead re-vamp his idea to make the softer, family-friendly, E.T. (although other elements went on to form Tobe Hooper's Poltergeist (1982), which Spielberg produced). Best viewed as a comapnion piece to Spielberg's 1977 film, Close Encounters Of The Third Kind, E.T. made a huge profit for Universal and narrowly lost the 1982 Academy Award for Best Film (losing to Gandhi (1981)). A heart-renedering tale of friendship and love, this ranks amongst Steven Spielberg's best films. No small accomplishment.

DJANGO UNCHAINED REVIEW (18)

No-one but Quentin Tarantino could've made a film like Django Unchained. Fusing together his love of violent westerns and blaxploitation films in the most blatant fashion in his whole career. One of his more lengthy films, it's so interesting that its length is an asset. Those expecting a Christophe Waltz performance akin to Inglourious B******s (2009) may be dissapointed (though he's certainly still entertaining) but it's the villains (Leonardo DiCaprio and Samuel L. Jackson) who steal the show.

Sunday, 13 January 2013

TEXAS CHAINSAW 3D REVIEW

Texas Chainsaw 3D (18). Compared to Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974), a film of which this is a sequel, Texas Chainsaw 3D has a lot more gore and lot less guts. Whilst the original TCM has a terrifying intensity that melds both a physical and psychological sense of dread, Texas Chainsaw 3D panders to the lowest common denominator and though it has a couple of ideas that try to make it interesting towards the final stretch, my reccomendation is just check out the first few minutes (which is just the original TCM anyway).

FILM OF THE WEEK: Black Cat (Gatto Nero)

(1981) (18): Obscure slice of Italian horror, shot and set in rural England as director Lucio Fulci loosely tackles a classic tale by Edgar Allen Poe. Like a lot of Fulci's films, its got a strong concept let down a little by a lack of budget and/or capabilities but for those, like me, who have a weakness for such material, it's worth a slight reccomendation.

Saturday, 12 January 2013

Les Misérables (12a): Tom Hooper's adaptation of the Schoenberg and Boublil musical, based on the Victor Hugo epic. Easily the best film of 2013 so far (though it was released in the US last year), the film matches, and even surpasses, the stage musical for stage and grandeur with amazing vocal performances from all the cast (admit it: Russel Crowe isn't as bad a singer as Pierce Brosnan). The first film to get a five star reccomendation for me this year, something no film last year managed.

Sunday, 6 January 2013

PLAYING FOR KEEPS REVIEW


It's a bad sign when you're watching a comedy and laughing...but not at the jokes. Playing For Keeps boasts a high-profile cast (Gerard Butler, Jessica Biel, Catherine Zeta Jones) and goes somewhere fairly new, but isn't funny, nor particularly heartfelt and has poor motivations for the characters. In this film, two divorced parents seek to mend their differences and no-one, not even good people or moving on from said marriage is safe. Not a great lesson. (Cert: 12a)

Saturday, 5 January 2013

FILM OF THE WEEK: Fargo (1996) (Cert: 18)

 
One of the best films of the 1990's (and one of my personal favourites) folksy comedy meets tense crime thriller in one the most definitive works by the Coen brothers and a theme that sounds like it belongs in a Spaghetti Western set in Middle Earth. It's a great little movie, you betcha!

The Impossible



New film from J.A Bayona, director of El Orfanato (The Orphanage) (2007) explores some of the similar themes, particularly the bonding between parent and child. Harrowing and emotive with a astounding sound design, even if the (true) story does downplay the impact of the events of December 26th 2004 on the people of Thailand.

Thursday, 3 January 2013

Parental Guidnace

 
Family comedy starring Billy Crystal has a strong opening and then goes largely downhill for about 30mins. After that, it perks back up leaving with a surprisingly mature (at times) picture, with a good cast.

Wednesday, 2 January 2013

Looking Forward/Looking Back: 2012 In Review 3/3


2012 was an interesting year for films. I wouldn’t say there were any five-star classics in 2012, but there were plenty of strong films and despite fears that cinema attendance is down in recent years (to be fair, cinema attendance has been going downhill since the introduction of television) this year did provide us with two films to have grossed over one billion US dollars, a very rare feat, with both The Dark Knight Rises and Skyfall breaching the marker. That the two films also rank amongst the most acclaimed films of the year (compare the hugely lucrative but critically loathed Transformers films) demonstrates that audiences don’t just go for lowest-common-denominator fluff (although only with Skyfall has the long-held snobbishness against James Bond films seems to have lifted).

 

On the other side, 3D is proving resilient, but slowly it seems that format is reaching a moderation point, compared to the 3D madness a couple of years ago. 3D is a format best suited for two things. One, to embrace the cheesiness of the entire gimmick (I’m sorry 3D lovers, 3D is a gimmick and when it hasn’t been in style, it’s been a laughing stock) such as in films like Piranha 3DD or in the odd occasion, where it’s actually used artistically. 2011’s Hugo is still the best use of the format yet in my eyes, but Life Of Pi has its moments.

 

2012 also showcases another new way in which to watch films with Peter Jackson’s use of 48 frames-per-second, twice the normal frame-rate of 24 in The Hobbit. The purpose for this is to aid with clarity and quality and picture and it’s an experiment which works…a little too well. Maybe this is a case off audiences not ready for such a major transition. After decades of experiencing films at 24fps, watching such a format becomes second-nature, so understandably, 48fps is a little jarring. When watching The Hobbit at 48fps, I confess, I actually briefly thought there was a problem with the projector initially, as everything seemed to be moving so quickly. I quickly realised this was not the case. It’s just because it is so detailed that in that surrounding, it can be disorienting to watch something move with such detail.

 

Clarity does not necessarily mean quality. A resounding criticism of The Hobbit was that it was very obvious at points that the film was being produced on a set and that the artificiality of surroundings was glaringly apparent. Films have often been compared to being akin to dreams, and that’s sort of how I see them.48fps brings realism, but realism is only an element of why people watch films. 24fps separates us from reality and provides a more suitable ambience than 48fps. Perhaps in the future, we will see 48fps become the standard bearer. Perhaps we will see people get used to the format, perhaps we will see it better executed and it may be that one day we’ll look upon 48fps compared to 24fps, the same way we look at colour compared to black and white. That still doesn’t mean that there isn’t artistry to black and white.

 

Lucasfilm was bought out by Disney this year and as a result, there are apparently new Star Wars films on the horizon, with the first being expected around 2015. What this means for other Lucasfilm properties is uncertain. There have been rumours since Indiana Jones And The Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull (2008) that there will be a fifth Indiana Jones film. Disney, seemingly has a say in that now, if that hasn’t been abandoned altogether. It should also be noted about how big Disney’s acquisition actually is. With Lucasfilm under their belt, Disney now also own Industrial Light And Magic along with Skywalker Sound; among the biggest, if not the biggest, special effects and film sound production companies in Hollywood.

 

Disney has also recently been pulling out it’s back-catalogue, retro-fitting it for 3D. 2011 gave us 1994’s The Lion King in 3D, this year, at least here in the UK, we got Beauty And The Beast in 3D. What does this change? Not a darn thing. The 3D is completely pointless, but it’s worth celebrating some of the best animated films of all time being back in theatres. We also saw in 2012, limited re-releases of such British classics as Chariots Of Fire (1981) and Lawrence Of Arabia (1962) along with a whole slew of significant films popping up in independent cinemas as part of the 100th anniversary of the British Film Institute (BFI). The British Board Of Film Classification (BBFC) also celebrated 100 years in 2012.

 

So what does 2013 have on the horizon? Well, with Award Season looming up, two of the biggest contenders for the Oscars that have already been released stateside in 2012, Lincoln and Les Miserables, are expected do very well as is Wreck-It Ralph a project from Disney Animation. There’s also a large number of horror remakes on the horizon including Carrie (a version that seems more faithful to Stephen King’s original novel), Evil Dead (by the looks of things, a darker version than the 1981 Sam Raimi cult classic, or at least what that became) and possibly a remake of Dario Argento’s surrealistic 1977 masterpiece, Suspiria (although this has been in an embryonic form for a few years). There’s also a 3D sequel to Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974) to kick off the year’s horror selection.

 

Oz: The Great And Powerful, Sam Raimi’s take on Frank L Baum’s The Wizard Of Oz is coming up as well as Gangster Squad, the next film in Hollywood’s current love affair with gangster films pushed up alongside vehicles for Arnold Schwarzenegger (The Last Stand) and Sylvester Stallone (Bullet To The Head) which has already been released in the US as has Django Unchained; Quentin Tarantino’s latest and perhaps his most blatant attempt at merging his love of Blaxploitation and Spaghetti Westerns. Whilst the Western genre will also have a re-boot of The Lone Ranger starring Johnny Depp.

 

The Hobbit: The Desolation Of Smaug is due in 2013 as well as zombie epic World War Z and the world’s other next attempt at a Zom-Rom-Com (following Shaun Of The Dead (2004)), Warm Bodies, starring Nicholas Hoult; who will also appear in Jack The Giant Killer; a grittier take on Jack And The Beanstalk.

 

Star Trek Into Darkness seems set to being one of the top sci-fi money spinners of 2013 alongside an adaptation of Orson Scott Card’s Ender’s Game. Monsters U will be Pixar’s next attempt at a sequel (the original Monsters Inc (2003) will also be retro-fitted into 3D and put into cinemas) and Man Of Steel is already getting big promotion.   

 

2013 is certainly looking like it will be a big year at the movies.

Tuesday, 1 January 2013

The Rest of 2012


 

11.       ParaNorman , Dirs. Chris Butler, Sam Fell, USA) (Cert: PG)

Starring: Kodi Smit-McPhee, Tucker Albrizzi, Anna Kendrick

 

Norman (Smit-McPhee) is not like other boys. This eleven-year-old enjoys watching horror movies and talking to his grandmother (Elaine Stricht)…who is dead.  Norman can see ghosts and spends much of his time talking to them even though he’s thought of as weird. The only other living kid who seems to like this side of Norman is Neil (Albrizzi) (who is also picked on, in his case for being fat). When Norman and Neil run into a strange man (John Goodman) who’s been checking on Norman and who then dies, Norman and Neil have to find a way to stop the dead from coming back to life.

 

Released almost at the same time as Frankenweenie (2012) and Hotel Transylvania (2012), ParaNorman faces something of a box-office rivalry, but it’s a strong offer willing to hold its own. Whilst ParaNorman is still, essentially, a kid’s movie, it  is a movie clearly written by horror buffs and with that audience still somewhat in mind. The synthy leitmotif for the zombies rising from the graves brings to mind late-70’s/early-80’s grindhouse zombie fare, whilst there’s a rather humorous homage to Halloween (1978) and Friday The 13th (1980) all in one gag. After a strong opening, the film falls back in momentum for about an hour before bringing back a little more of a punch in the climax. Yes, it sags a little in the middle, but it’s a smart, well-made and at times hilarious love-letter to classic horror movies.

 

12.       Skyfall (Dir. Sam Mendes, UK) (Cert: 12a)

       Starring: Daniel Craig, Javier Bardem, Naomie Harris

 

During a mission to Turkey with a young operative named Eve (Harris), James Bond (Craig) gets into a fight with an assailant (Ola Rapace) and is accidentally shot by Eve and falls into a river. Having been declared legally dead, Bond returns to service and goes on the trail of a computer expert (Bardem), who is leaking information and identities of agents and causing havoc.

 

Following on from the brilliantly paced Casino Royale (2006) and the less involving, but still slightly impressive, Quantum Of Solace (2008), Skyfall falls somewhere between them in terms of quality. The film begins with a disappointing start, all generic action and little in the way of depth. However, as the film goes on, more is revealed. This is one of the richer (if not the richest) Bond film in terms of character and backstory for James Bond as we explore elements of his upbringing. Javier Bardem makes, unsurprisingly, an interesting and memorable antagonist both menacing and a little campy. Eve is not one of the most interesting Bond girls for the most part (nor is the secondary Bond girl played by Bérénice Lim Marloe) but the twists at the end (three in turn) that relate to continuity (somewhat frustratingly for those who really care about such things) do redeem her character a little. With one of the most starry casts in a Bond film (the likes of Albert Finney and Ralph Fiennes turn up in support roles) and a good crew (Sam Mendes has perhaps the most pre-existing fame of any first-time Bond director and is joined by Coen brothers cinematographer Roger Deakins) Skyfall rewards a patient audience with one of the stronger films in the series.

 

13.       Seven Psychopaths (Dir. Martin McDonagh, UK) (Cert: 15)

 

Starring: Colin Farrell, Christopher Walken, Sam Rockwell

 

Marty (Farrell), an Irish screenwriter living in LA, is wanting to work on a new screenplay, but only has the title “Seven Psychopaths”. With the help of his friend Billy (Rockwell), Marty manages to flesh out his screenplay with the story of seven variously different psychopaths. Meanwhile, a serial “dognapper” (Walken) who secretly steals dogs and returns them for the reward money, steals the prized Shi-Tzu (Bonny) of a local criminal (Woody Harrelson). When these worlds collide (courtesy of Billy, who looks after Walken’s pilfered pooches), Marty realises he’s bitten off a lot more than he can chew.

 

Seven Psychopaths is a slippery film. Thematically and narratively it is a very complex film that deals with a number of rich and varied characters, but it largely pulls it off. This is in no small part due to the strong performances of the ensemble cast, especially Christopher Walken turning in some amazing work, whilst Sam Rockwell provides a great comic character in Billy (his description of his ideal desert shoot-out is a brilliant moment of comedic acting and writing). However, in keeping with the complex nature of the film some plot threads are confusing whilst others are nowhere near the revelations they intend to be and some of the more publicised and supposedly more prominent stars (Olga Kurylenko, Tom Waits) don’t exactly hang around. All the same, this is a clever and uproariously funny film that will definitely leave some sort of impact on the viewer.

 

14.       Great Expectations (Dir. Mike Newell, UK/USA) (Cert: 12a)

 

Starring: Jeremy Irvine, Holliday Grainger, Helena Bonham Carter

 

As a young boy, Phillip “Pip” Pirrip (Irvine/Toby Irvine) aids the escape of a criminal named Magwitch (Ralph Fiennes). Years later, Pip discovers that a mystery identity of some wealth has bequeathed money to Pip, who proceeds to live the life of a gentleman in London, only to discover that he will always have a past.

 

Charles Dickens’ classic tale of rags-to-riches is no stranger to the big screen. Indeed, the 1946 film adaptation by Sir David Lean may be the most revered Dickens adaptation in film history so what exactly does the highly-reputed Mike Newell of such diverse films as Four Weddings And A Funeral (1994) and Harry Potter And The Goblet Of Fire (2005) have to offer things? Primarily, a strong cast is what is at the heart of this picture. His Potter credentials serve him well with Ralph Fiennes and Robbie Coltrane delivering strong performances as does Helena Bonham Carter as perhaps the story’s most iconic character, Miss Havisham (though is still noticeably a little youthful and glamorous for the part, despite how well she plays it). Newell gives the film just enough of a contemporary edge to make it fresh, and

whilst it doesn’t take any strong risks, it’s still a very pleasing film.

 

15.       The Woman In Black (Dir. James Watkins, UK/Canada/Sweden)

 

Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Ciarán Hinds, Janet McTeer

 

Arthur Kipps (Radcliffe) a recently-widowed young solicitor leaves London to attend to a house owned by a recently-deceased client. Upon arrival, Kipps notices the stand-offish manner of the locals, some strange phenomena in the house and a mysterious woman in a black dress.

 

A great deal of faith rests in The Woman In Black an adaptation of the Susan Hill novel. A film made to help re-launch British studio Hammer (best known for their string of distinctive horror films from the 1950’s to the 1970’s) as well as to progress the career of Daniel Radcliffe following the conclusion of his seven-film, highly lucrative run as JK Rowling’s boy wizard, Harry Potter. The latter goal it accomplishes brilliantly. A talented actor, Radcliffe shows maturity as the still young Arthur Kipps, with elements of the likes of Peter Cushing and Ralph Bates in his performance. As for bringing back the Hammer style, it’s a bit more mixed. The film has Hammer’s traditional gothic approach and fans of the films will easily notice the set that was used for the interior of castle Dracula in the older Hammer films (the story in itself owes something of a debt to Dracula) and whilst the film lacks much of the distinctive Hammer blood and no nudity (no bad thing as Hammer’s attitude to this lead to its creative downfall). The film also has more shocks than an electric chair execution. So many that even the most seasoned and jaded horror fan will jump at least once whilst the uneasy atmosphere helps sell the picture. It probably won’t be a classic, but as far as re-starting the Hammer franchise goes, it’s a worthy effort.

 

16.       The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (Dir. Peter Jackson, USA/New Zealand) (Cert: 12a)

 

Starring: Martin Freeman, Sir Ian McKellen, Richard Armitage

 

Bilbo Baggins (Freeman) lives a life free from complications in The Shire, until he is visited one day by Gandalf The Grey (McKellen); a wizard that Bilbo hasn’t seen in years. Gandalf is quickly followed by thirteen dwarves looking to find a jewel, sacred to their people. Joined with Gandalf, Bilbo and the dwarves venture forth to take the jewel from the fierce dragon (Benedict Cumberbatch) holding onto it.

 

The first part of a trilogy based on J.R.R Tolkien’s beloved fantasy novel, The Hobbit signifies the first time director Peter Jackson has tackled Tolkien since his highly acclaimed trilogy of based on Hobbit follow-up, The Lord Of The Rings, the three films being released between 2001 and 2005. For this return, Jackson tailors the film to suit the different issues surround The Hobbit as a book. Written more for children, the film is lighter and more whimsical in tone and the book’s three-hundred-and-ten pages (at least going by the first edition) are condensed to a third of the story to keep with the trilogy, but lengthened more to the standard of the approximate three-hours apiece of the Lord Of The Rings films. Of course, this makes the film more padded than a luxury mattress. Many will find the film’s delving into the minutiae of Hobbit and Dwarf culture especially tedious and the overly-plentiful and lengthy set-pieces are a definite flaw that results from sticking too closely to the motif. But the warmth, charm, humour and stunning scenery that made Jackson’s previous Tolkien epics such favourites is still present here, from brilliant performances from all the cast, but especially Martin Freeman and Andy Serkis, whose interplay is the film’s greatest sequence.

 

17.       The Muppets (2011, Dir. James Bobin, USA)

 

Starring: Jason Segel, Amy Adams, Kermit The Frog (Brian Henson).

 

Gary (Segel) and his girlfriend Mary (Adams) leave their small town (itself called Smalltown) for a romantic getaway to Los Angeles, taking with them Gary’s mild-mannered and “different” brother, Walter (Peter Linz) who is obsessed with the Muppets (physically he appears to be a Muppet himself). They find Muppet Studios deserted and a local oil tycoon Tex Richman (Chris Cooper) looking to tear it down for the oil reserves underneath. Hoping to stop this, Gary, Mary and Walter find the Muppets to get them to reunite and save the studio.

 

The first theatrical outing for Jim Henson’s endearing band of puppets since 1999’s Muppets In Space (although they’ve made appearances in made for TV films and Sesame Street is still on-going) The Muppets plays to what it knows it’s strengths. Humour, music and sentiment often mixed together. Although the film plays for a younger audience it’s also faithful to those older Muppet fans with songs such as the classic Rainbow Connection as well as the beautiful new ballad Pictures In My Head (with an melancholic air of mourning for the late Jim Henson). The film is rife with cameos (which could be a failing of the film as many of these stars may not last too long in public consciousness.) and has a general wealth of humour that puts it on the higher end of the group’s films.

 

18.       Room 237 (Dir. Rodney Ascher, USA) (Cert: 15)

 

Starring: Bill Blakemore, Geoffrey Cocks, Juli Kearns

 

What’s in room 237? Well, there’s an analysis of the different themes behind Stanley Kubrick’s 1980 classic horror film, The Shining. Taking apart piece-by-piece subtle elements of the story, various analysts explore themes as diverse as the genocide of Native Americans, the holocaust and faked moon landings.

 

I think it pretty much goes without saying you need to see The Shining before seeing Room 237 (and preferably the US full cut, as opposed to the long available edited version in the UK). Room 237 is an intriguing piece of film that serves as a good accompaniment to Kubrick’s classic. The interviewees are presented in voice over (which can mean that you’ll probably get accounts mixed up first time, if not paying attention) layed over continuous sequences of The Shining alongside footage from documentaries on their chosen subject and from other films (fellow Italian horror aficionados will probably notice the frequent use of footage from Lamberto Bava’s Démoní (Demons) (1985)). Needless to say, viewers will find some interpretations more engaging than others. For instance, as relatively easy to read and as well-known an interpretation as it is, I prefer the Native American reading of the film, opposed to one interviewees belief in a conspiracy that Stanley Kubrick directed faked footage of the moon landings.  This won’t appeal to everyone (I found myself thinking people were looking for themes that weren’t really there and were over-analyising) but to Kubrick fans and film analysts, this documentary is practically a must.

 

19.       The Avengers (Avengers Assemble) (Dir. Joss Whedon, USA) (Cert: 12a)

 

Starring: Samuel L. Jackson, Scarlett Johansen, Tom Hiddleston

 

When a scientific experiment goes awry, a portal across time and space is opened and the villainous Loki (Hiddleston) is unleashed. Nick Fury (Jackson) commissions a team of superheroes, Black Widow (Johansen), Captain America (Chris Evans), Hulk (Mark Ruffalo/Lou Ferrigno), Thor (Chris Hemsworth) and Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.) to help save the world.

 

Released as Avengers in the US and named Avengers Assemble in several territories (probably to avoid confusion with British spy series, The Avengers) Avengers Assemble is directed by Joss Whedon, best known for successes of Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Firefly and Dollhouse for TV (Whedon originally made Buffy The Vampire Slayer as a movie in 1992, and is also credited as a writer for Toy Story (1995)) and is a Marvel fan’s wet dream. Building on already successful film ventures from Marvel, the film has a great concept combining all the heroic forces and there’s great chemistry amongst the ensemble lead cast, with them all given roughly equivalent screen-time. The villains are let down slightly in that we only have Loki as an adversary and he is a rather annoying one at that. The 3D effects work well within the context of the film, but the whole film like most modern superhero films can go into CGI overload. Whilst DC’s rival Batman films go for darkness and drama, and does it very well, Marvel goes the opposite direction and the whole film is light-hearted lapsing often into full-on comedy. It’s as dumb as a sack of hammers, but just be advised to switch off your brain and let your spirit fly free and you’ll be fine.

 

20.   Prometheus (Dir. Sir Ridley Scott, USA/UK) (Cert: 15)

 

Starring: Noomi Rapace, Michael Fassbender, Charlize Theron

 

A series of ancient artefacts point to evidence of an alien visitation to Earth billions of years ago. A crew of explorers aboard the ship Prometheus explore a distant world to see what this could all mean about the origins of mankind, but find something very sinister on the surface.

               

After thirty years, Ridley Scott returns to the science fiction genre with a prequel to his classic 1979 sci-fi/horror hybrid, Alien. Despite the many years between the two films the design is very much faithful to Scott’s original vision, but the few alterations are mostly unnecessary and out of place. Where Scott’s science-fiction films endured was in the special effects department. A combination of cutting-edge technology and a use of darkness to hide imperfections and aging (a trick he used superbly on Alien and to a lesser extent on Blade Runner (1982)) Prometheus is a lighter film cinematographically and uses CGI in a fashion that goes against Alien’s original strength and power, impressive though it is, I doubt this film will age as well. Thankfully, the 3D adds nothing substantial which will aid this film’s progression. As casting goes, Michael Fassbender is a perfect fit for the ship’s resident android in a performance in keeping with Ian Holm’s performance in Alien and Lance Hendriksen’s in the sequel Aliens (1986) and Noomi Rapace does a brilliantly physical performance only slightly hampered by her thick Swedish accent going against her British character’s origins.

 

21.   Safety Not Guaranteed Dir. Colin Trevorrow, USA) (Cert: 15)

 

Starring: Aubrey Plaza, Mark Duplass, Jake Johnson

 

Working as an intern at a Seattle magazine, Darius (Lauren Carlos, Plaza) takes an assignment along with another intern (Karan Soni), following a writer (Johnson) to Ocean View to interview an odd-ball, Kenneth (Duplass); who is looking for someone to travel with him on a time machine he claims to have built. Through her research, Darius discovers that Matthew might not be so crazy after all.

 

Safety Not Guaranteed is yet another quirky, hipster-ish comedy with eccentrically charming characters and off-beat acoustic songs. However, whilst this works against the film, Safety Not Guaranteed has a lot going for it. It’s an interesting story that is very well told and takes some genuinely surprising turns. The film does move at a brisk pace and some of the plot points don’t really seem to ever get resolved, but overall the film is very well-written with decent performances.

 

22.   Marley Dir. Kevin Macdonald, USA/UK) (Cert: 15)

 

Starring: Bob Marley, Ziggy Marley, Jimmy Cliff

 

Marley is a documentary on the life of Jamaican reggae superstar, Bob Marley and follows his life from his childhood in Jamaica and all the way through his music career as he becomes not only one of the world’s biggest musical personalities, but the spokesperson for an entire culture.

 

There are few people in popular music who have made as much of an impact on a truly cultural level as Bob Marley; the man who symbolises not only reggae music to many, but also Rastafarianism and Jamaica. Such a legacy is difficult to capture in a film and contain it within the parameters of making it financially viable, but Marley gives the idea its best shot and, mostly, pulls it off. It’s superbly shot with great insight into the man and his beliefs, albeit only up until he becomes world famous. Whilst this part, is still strong, it could’ve done with more exploration of Marley as a whole in the later years of his life, and neglecting, at a moment of his life as he became a cultural icon is quite a mistake to make. However, for those who are fans of Bob Marley’s this is an important film.

 

 

23.   Rise Of The Guardians (Dir. Peter Ramsey, USA) (Cert: PG)

 

Starring: Chris Pine, Alec Baldwin, Jude Law

 

Jack Frost (Pine) has the special gift of being able to cover landscapes with frost and cold weather, which he has been doing with great joy for over four hundred years. Unsure of his purpose, he is called by the voiceless Man In The Moon to join The Guardians. A group of holiday-related figures consisting of Santa Claus, also known as North (Baldwin), the Easter Bunny known as Bunnymund (Hugh Jackman), the Tooth Fairy (Isla Fisher) and The Sandman, just in time for them to have to protect the children of the Earth from the sinister fear-inducing magic of Pitch Black (Law).

 

Based on William Joyce’s book series, The Guardians Of Childhood, Rise Of The Guardians has clear intentions of being the first of a series for itself. Judging by this film, that’s not in itself a bad thing. Rise Of The Guardians isn’t the perfect film as it’s a little too focused on simply entertaining children (strange for, essentially, an action film) rather than a more general audience and the film falls a little short of the colourful exploits of the similar Avengers Assemble (2012) but the characters are entertaining and are given a surprisingly even focus. The animation is also gorgeous and makes the most of the 3D format, especially in the opening moments. Entertaining and fun, there are certainly worse things for a film to do but don’t look for much beyond the surface here.

 

24.   Gambit (Dir. Michael Hoffman, UK/USA) (Cert: 12a)

 

Starring: Colin Firth, Cameron Diaz, Alan Rickman

 

Art dealer Harry Dean (Firth) and his assistant, an art forger known as The Major (Tom Courtenay) hit upon a scheme to get back at Dean’s wealthy and crass boss, Lionel Shabandar (Rickman). Travelling to Texas, Dean and The Major meet with rodeo queen, P.J Puznowksi (Diaz) in order to obtain a fake that she owns of Manet’s painting Haystacks Dusk, a painting that Shabandar has spent years trying to collect.

 

A remake of the 1966 film of the same name, Gambit still owes something of a debt of influence to British comedy in the 1960’s. Lead Colin Firth plays his traditional role of the almost unflappable and very British hero, but with elements that suggest a more classic approach (like a more down-to-earth Peter Sellers). As for the other roles, Cameron Diaz is surprisingly very strong as the unpretentious Texan of P.J Puznowski (Tom Courtenay also delivers a strong understated performance) whilst Alan Rickman’s talents only get, sadly, a rare chance to shimmer. Some of the gags are flat and disappointing given the Coen brothers screenplay, and the film never gets as far as inducing belly laughs, but it’s satisfactory stuff.

 

25.   Beasts Of The Southern Wild (Dir. Benh Zeitlin, USA) (Cert: 12a)

Starring:  Quvenzané Wallis, Dwight Henry, Gina Montana

 

A little girl known simply as “Hushpuppy” (Wallis), lives with her father (Henry) in a dilapidated shack in a part of the Mississippi Delta known simply as “The Bathtub”. During an argument, Hushpuppy’s dad collapses and two grow closer as his health fails him. When a major storm kicks up, The Bathtub is completely destroyed, leaving Hushpuppy, her father and the other Bathtub residents to fend for themselves.

 

Made on a low-budget, Beasts Of The Southern Wild has a simple and honest feel to it and doesn’t compromise any integrity. This is at once a bleak portrayal of poverty, destitution and loneliness, but also has affirming elements of whimsy. It’s implied that Hushpuppy can speak to animals and slowly the film goes from realism to fantasy, though still with a rough look. This film could just be a surreal portrait of life at the time of Hurricane Katrina (the setting certainly seems to hint at this very strongly) or an escapist fairytale. It doesn’t quite shake out all the available fairy-dust and it’s a little too “kooky” for its own good at times, but the performances (especially young Willis’) are strong and the film does have a slight sense of wonder.

 

26.   Ted (Dir. Seth MacFarlane, USA) (Cert: 15)

Starring: Mark Wahlberg, Seth McFarlane, Mila Kunis

 

One Christmas in 1985, eight-year-old John Bennett (Bretton Manley, Colton Shires, Wahlberg) wishes that his brand new teddy bear, Ted, can come alive. John gets his wish and Ted can walk and talk (with the voices of Zane Cowans and later Seth MacFarlane). Because of this magical occurrence, Ted becomes a celebrity. Twenty-seven years later, Ted has lapsed into obscurity and spends his time living with a now grown John. With John’s girlfriend, Lori (Kunis) wanting to have a more serious relationship with John, he faces a dilemma about his relationship with her and Ted.

 

The feature-length live-action directorial debut of animator and voice-over artist Seth MacFarlane (best known for the shows Family Guy and American Dad!), Ted is a film about the pressures of growing up done in McFarlane’s distinct combination of post-South Park low-brow humour and classic American sit-com values. The film has an interesting and unique opening concept, but at its heart it’s actually a film that’s been done many times before (save for a subplot that only really kicks in towards the film’s conclusion). Mila Kunis (a regular associate of MacFarlane’s who has received critical acclaim in Black Swan (2010)) delivers perhaps the film’s strongest performance but both Wahlberg and McFarlane do a decent job. With a largely predictable formula that is well handled, Ted’s a film that won’t last as long in the memory as it intends to, but it’s still a fairly good film.

 

27.   The Expendables 2 (Dir. Simon West, USA) (Cert: 15)

Starring: Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham, Jean-Claude Van Damme

 

With a military strike force on their way back from Tibet, their superior, Church (Bruce Willis) informs the strike force’s leader, Barney Ross (Stallone) that his gang owe him five million dollars thanks to the destruction of their last mission. With Church giving the group a new member, Chinese computer expert Maggie Chan (Nan Yu) the strike force embark towards Russia where the investigation about a crashed military airplane, leads a race to stop a nuclear attack.

 

Whilst the first Expendables film, released in 2010, did somewhat deliver on its marketing of compiling a dream team of 80’s action movie icons, the film (somewhat to its credit) went more for grit, drama and realism than expected. This film largely forgoes that and instead delivers the advertised goods without pretension, and becomes a better film for that. Building on its roster of nostalgia-tastic muscle-bound characters with the addition of the likes of Chuck Norris and Jean-Claude Van Damme (and an expansion on the cameo roles of Arnold Schwarzenegger and Bruce Willis from the last film). The film’s screenplay is the main fault. Whilst the film was obviously never intended as a cerebral exercise, the rather haphazard approach to exposition makes certain plot points difficult to fully comprehend and, though humorous, some of the visual jokes fall flat from the lack of clarity. Nan Yu’s addition to an otherwise male-centric group is welcomed, but the screenplay smacks of sexism in places and never truly resolves that issue. On the plus side, the film looks very well made (at least as far as set-design goes) and the allusions to the actors are a welcome touch, referencing Chuck Norris’ famed “Facts” and the genuine truth that Dolph Lungdren is actually profoundly intelligent in the matter of chemical engineering. It’s an okay film and overall it works, it just has issues.

 

28.   Frankenweenie (Dir. Tim Burton, USA) (Cert: PG)

 

Starring: Charlie Tahan, Frank Welker, Atticus Schaffer

 

 

Young Victor Frankenstein (Tahan) is told by a strange local girl (Catherine O’Hara) that something big will happen to him soon. That big thing happens to be the death of his beloved pet dog, Sparky (Welker). Inspired by a lesson given the new science teacher (Martin Landau), Victor brings Sparky back to life, but this secret of science doesn’t stay secret for long.

 

After releasing the live-action film Dark Shadows (2012), Burton quickly delivers this animated film, strangely without his regular animation side-kick, Henry Selick (given their previous collaborations in Beetlejuice (1988) and The Nightmare Before Christmas (1993)). Burton is himself an animator, having begun his career with Disney (who also produced this film). Like his other films, Burton’s love of classic horror is abundantly clear in this film which is mostly an homage to James Whale’s films Frankenstein (1931) and Bride Of Frankenstein (1933) (there’s even a very subtle use of Bride’s main theme in Danny Elfman’s score when a dog receives a shock that turns it’s fur into the Bride’s iconic do). Burton’s main players Johnny Depp and Helena Bonham-Carter are absent, although he works again with Martin Landau (from Ed Wood (1995)) and one of his most recent regulars, Sir Christopher Lee (in a creative archived use of his Hammer Dracula role). The film is short and could’ve done with a lot more detail in the story, but it’s entertaining and endearing, especially the surprisingly realistic-acting dog Sparky.

 

29.   Lawless (Dir. Jonathan Hillcoat, USA) (Cert: 18)

 

Starring: Shia LaBeouf, Tom Hardy, Guy Pearce

 

The Bouderant brothers, Jack (LaBeouf), Forrest (Hardy) and Howard (Jason Clarke) are well-known in Franklin County, Virginia for their bootlegging and making moonshine. With crime in the prohibition-era area running rampant, and the police force seemingly benefitting, a cop by the name of Charlie Rakes (Pearce) rides into town and quickly squashes the moonshine operation with an iron fist. But the Bouderant brothers set to prove they aren’t so easily taken care of.

 

In a year when there are a number of gangster and crime films being put on the market, Lawless received perhaps the most publicity, and not without reason, with two of the film’s cast, Tom Hardy and Gary Oldman, also playing prominent roles in The Dark Knight Rises that same year. However, Lawless is, deliberately, a lot less slick and has a murky rustic quality befitting the Appalachian environment that is this film’s setting. Based on a true story, adapted into the book “The Wettest County The World” and then adapted into a screenplay by Nick Cave (also known for singing with Australian band, The Bad Seeds) somewhere along the way something is lost in the film. On a strictly dialogue basis, the film is well-written but it lacks a form or tension and at times just seems like a succession of inconsequential scenes put together, even though there is clearly narrative in there. The cast still drives home a good, but not remarkable, performance though (LaBeouf is trying to shake off his child star past and be taken more seriously, but it still may take a while for the audience to come around to it) and Guy Pearce plays a character so dastardly and unlikable it seems hard to believe that this man really was real. Solid, entertaining, but not exactly the classic gangster epic it wants so hard to be.

 

30.   The Pirates! In An Adventure With Scientists (The Pirates! Band Of Misfits) (Dirs. Peter Lord, Jeff Newitt, USA/UK) (Cert: U) ***

 

Starring: Hugh Grant, David Tennant, Martin Freeman

 

A ship-full of pirates, captained by the handily named Pirate Captain (Grant) sail the seven seas with one main ambition; to claim enough booty to win the prestigious Pirate Of The Year Award. In an attempted raid, the pirates end up face-to-face with scientist Charles Darwin (Tennant) who informs them that their “parrot” Polly is in fact a dodo and that he wishes to exhibit the believed-to-be-extinct bird to the scientific community.

 

These days, animated films seem to veer more towards CGI as a form of animation and whilst this is in itself no bad thing, it’s companies like Aardman who remind us gleefully that there are alternatives out there with their plastercine stop-motion animation (even if Pirates has a smattering of CG). Pirates isn’t the first stop-motion film to be rendered into 3D (it’s preceded at least by the 3D version of The Nightmare Before Christmas (1993)) it’s an interesting novelty of itself, though thankfully it’s not overrun by the 3D craze (which means it’ll probably have more longevity). The writing is pleasingly amusing with a few laugh-out-loud moments, though it’s eye on Victorian history is a little hit-and-miss (it’s set in 1837 but it references Bram Stoker’s Dracula which was written much later) but with some pleasing twists (In the film, Imelda Staunton’s Queen Victoria is a member of a dining club that eats rare animals. An obscure real-life fact is that Darwin was a member of a similar society). The acting is undemanding though Hugh Grant manages to break free of his stereotypical mumbling fop and is near unrecognisable and quite charismatic (it’s also noted that Aardman’s distinct approach to faces has actually succeeded in making Salma Hayek look unattractive, even if that’s not the intention) Time will have to tell if it’s up-to-scratch with Wallace And Gromit (1989 - ) or Chicken Run (2000), and it probably isn’t, but it’s still got a sense of charm and sometimes succeeds beyond expectations.

 

31.   Men In Black 3 (2012, Dir. Barry Sonnenfeld, USA) (Cert: 12)

Starring: Will Smith, Josh Brolin, Jemaine Clement

 

Boris (Clement), an alien criminal, breaks out of a high-security prison on the moon and travels back in time. Meanwhile, J (Smith) a member of the Men In Black discovers that his long-time partner, K (Tommy Lee Jones) has actually been dead years because of Boris killing him by travelling in time. Now, J must set things right by travelling back in time to take down Boris with the help of a young K (Brolin).

 

The second sequel two Men In Black (1997), Men In Black III introduces a time travel element to the series which adds a good new dimension. Time is a good variant to add as it’s noticeable how much older people have gotten since the last time on the screen (Men In Black II in 2002). Tommy Lee Jones is definitely looking too old and so he’s kept out of the action (but it seems almost certain that there’ll be no Men In Black 4 as a result.) and Rip Torn’s Z is no longer in (instead replaced by O, played by Emma Thompson) The main villain, Boris, is played by Jemaine Clement channelling Tim Curry and is often entertaining. It’s not as entertaining as the first film, but it’s well put together and is worth watching.

32.   Jack Reacher (Dir. Chris McQuarrie, USA) (Cert: 12a)

 

Starring: Tom Cruise, Rosamund Pike, David Oyelowo

 

When a sniper attack leaves six people dead in Pittsburgh, the accused (Joseph Sikora) asks for assistance from Jack Reacher (Cruise); an ex-soldier with no real identity or history, who just travels from place to place righting wrongs. With the help of the accused sniper’s lawyer (Pike), Jack looks to get to the bottom of what really happened.

 

Based on the book series by British writer, Lee Child, the thing that strikes me about Jack Reacher is that it’s not particularly well-written in terms of dialogue. The humorous elements of the script are not particularly funny and the exposition becomes quickly convoluted. The casting decisions are also a little odd. Whilst much is made of the famously small dark-haired Tom Cruise playing the tall blonde figure of Jack Reacher, casting problems are more apparent with archetypal English rose, Rosamund Pike who, whilst trying hard, doesn’t quite pull of an American accent. Usually directing, this time acting, Werner Herzog makes a great villain despite not really “performing” (Herzog just has an absolutely brilliant speaking voice so he can be captivating without even trying) and the supporting cast perform ably. However, the film mostly stands out as a visually astounding piece of work (cinematography by the legendary Caleb Deschanel) which makes it an entertaining film despite its many very visible flaws.

 

33.   Yellow (Dir. Ryan Haysom, Germany) (Cert: TBC)

             Starring: Stephen M. Gilbert, Rocco Menzel, Hester Arden

 

A man (Gilbert) drives through the city at night and in the day is menaced by strange phone  calls, more than likely related to a spate of serial killings happening across the city. As the man starts to piece together the clues, he tries to take down the killer (Menzel) himself.

 

An homage to the classic giallo cinema of the 1970’s, Yellow (the English translation of the word “giallo”), is a short film that definitely leans on the experimental side of the horror/thriller subgenre, and that’s saying something. Most of the clichés of giallo are apparent. A masked killer with a razor, slashings of throats and lashings of blood with more than a hint of insanity, Yellow probably would’ve benefitted from being feature-length and more fleshed out (some of the confusing elements are clearly intentional, other parts that confuse probably are because of unintentional unfamiliarity) and whilst this may lack the visual flair of the glory days of Dario Argento (understandably), it’s a nice looking film all the same.

34.   Rock Of Ages (Dir. Adam Shankman, USA) (Cert: 12)

Starring: Julianne Hough, Diego Boneta, Tom Cruise

 

It’s 1987 and Los Angeles, the music capital of the world, is in the grips of “Hair Metal” fever. Naïve Southern girl, Sherrie (Hough) makes it to LA to fulfil her dream of being a singer only to become a waitress at a popular nightclub working alongside another aspiring singer named Drew (Boneta). But the club is facing hard time financially, not helped by the campaign by the wife (Catharine Zeta-Jones) of the local mayor (Bryan Cranston) to shut down the club because of its celebration of such lewd music. Can big-time rock star Staciee Jaxx (Cruise) be counted on to save the day?

 

Adapted from the stage musical of the same name, Rock Of Ages is a rather hit-and-miss affair of rather inconsistent quality throughout. The film certainly doesn’t start well with a saccharine cover of the already fairly soft power ballad Sister Christian by Night Ranger and each song is guilty in its own way of being over-produced and glossed to within an inch of its life (considering the source material, that’s something of an achievement) not to mention the rather uneven balance of artists that are referenced in these songs (for example, three songs by Def Leppard and Foreigner, two by Poison yet no Van Halen or KISS…and you can’t convince me Gene Simmons would’ve turned the opportunity down). However, the film is aided by a supporting cast of gifted actors, some of whom also turn in good singing performances (Russell Brand has a much more appealing singing voice than when he’s mangling a West-Midlands accent). The production itself looks cheap with knocked-up sets but there’s something in the innocence and slightly knowing silliness that saves this film from my total wrath. Despite myself, I ended up enjoying it and am not completely sure why. It’s just baffling.

35.   Ruby Sparks (, Dirs. Jonathan Dayton, Valerie Faris, USA) (Cert: 15)

 

Starring: Paul Dano, Zoe Kazan, Chris Messina

 

Calvin Weir-Fields (Dano) wrote a very popular novel ten years ago and has been struggling for a follow-up ever since. At the insistence of his psychiatrist (Elliott Gould), Calvin begins to write a story about a woman who can love someone for who they are and when he incorporates a woman from his dreams that he calls Ruby Sparks (Kazan) he regains his inspiration, only for Ruby to suddenly turn up in real life.

 

Much like how Calvin’s novel is a follow-up a highly successful first story, Ruby Sparks is the first film in six years from the directors behind Little Miss Sunshine and so the point of inspiration is obvious. However, Ruby Sparks isn’t completely worth the wait. There are films that have used this idea before, but Ruby Sparks takes the film in a more romantic direction. The character of Ruby is deliberately designed to be a perfect dream girl and it seems perfectly logical for Calvin to be highly flawed by comparison; however he does things in this film which draw any real sympathy away from him. Other than that, the film is competently made and has a really good score; it’s just a little darker than it should’ve been.

 

36.   On The Road (Dir. Walter Salles, France/UK/USA/Brazil) (Cert: 15)

 

Starring: Sam Riley, Garret Hedlund, Kristen Stewart

 

This adaptation of the classic Jack Kerouac novel follows Sal Paradise (Riley) a young intellectual who spends his time partying and philosophising with fellow writer Dean Moriarty (Hedlund) and Moriarty’s young bride Mary-Lou (Stewart). The trio travel across the United States taking in the culture, the eccentricity and the hedonism.

 

Kerouac’s seminal slice of Beat literature has been a favourite of counter-culture enthusiasts since publication but this adaptation brought courtesy of various independent studios (including Francis Ford Coppola’s American Zoetrope) is the first time the story has been told through cinema. So, what to make of it? It’s a film that grasps the significance of the first adaptation of the popular work and takes itself very seriously. It’s clear that director Walter Salles intended this film to be an all-time classic, but it just isn’t. There’s much contemplation of human life and on society, but it drags on without much that can really be taken in. The parts where characters are actually living these lives of desire are the moment where the film really catches fire with frenzied, fast-cut jiving through hyperactive jazz music and enthusiastic orgies. The performances are strong, but the film drags itself so morosely through chapters you’ll probably forget most of the film before too long. The stuff that stays in the mind? Well, it’s probably got good reason to.

 

37.   Dark Shadows (Dir. Tim Burton, USA) (Cert: 12)

Starring: Johnny Depp, Eva Green, Michelle Pfeiffer.

 

In the days of Colonial America, the wealthy Barnabas Collins (Depp) is cursed by a witch (Green), whose affections he has spurned. This curse means that Collins is doomed to spend eternity as a Vampire. After being sealed in the Earth by the locals, Barnabas manages to regain his freedom in 1972. Settling in with his descendants, he soon comes across the same witch who now owns a fishing company intent on driving the Collins family out of their family business.

 

An adaptation of a popular paranormal soap opera in the US virtually unknown on these shores when compared to The Addams Family or The Munsters, Dark Shadows is clearly a labour of love for director Tim Burton, who brings his distinctive sense of gothic/expressionistic style to proceedings. Dark Shadows is amusing in places, but doesn’t rank amongst Burton’s best. Johnny Depp, however, still manages to be on strong form clearly clowning about as Barnabas, albeit in the same way Depp usually approaches these types. As for the rest of the cast, Pfeiffer and Green perform ably although produce nothing special and Chloë Grace-Moretz provides perhaps the most disturbing role as a Lolita-styled adolescent that seems a little…discomforting (especially in her opening scenes). Christopher Lee makes another Burton film appearance almost unrecognisable as an old sea-dog (Burton clearly being aware that Lee has himself played a vampire who ends up in 1972). Though Dark Shadows disappoints, it isn’t a complete waste of a film, though it clearly runs out of things to say or interesting things to do in the last twenty minutes.

 

38.   The Possession (Dir. Ole Bornedal, USA) (Cert: 15)

Starring: Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Natasha Calis, Madison Davenport

 

A strange box is given away at a yard sale after it caused the serious injury of its owner (Anna Hagan). When a young girl named Emily (Calis), has it bought for her by recently-divorced dad (Morgan), they take it to their new house. Soon Emily begins to act very strangely and begins to change. What is the secret of the box?

 

Produced by Sam Raimi, who brought to the screen not only the Spiderman trilogy (2002, 2004, 2007) but also the horror classic Evil Dead trilogy (1981, 1987, 1992) and Drag Me To Hell (2009), The Possession treads similar territory initially as Drag Me To Hell (bringing with it ancient traditions and possible occultism unleashed by a curse/physical object), but slowly changes until in the film’s final third it basically becomes a Jewish version of The Exorcist (1973). Much of the humour that marked Raimi’s work is absent here and the film is a much more straight-forward horror story, well-acted by the cast. The film does fall on the same transition styles constantly (Frantic soundtrack, cut to black, piano note. Lather, rinse, repeat.) and isn’t as scary as it tries to be, but it’s still a decent but unremarkable horror film.

39.   The Amazing Spider-Man  (Dir. Marc Webb, USA) (Cert: 12A)     

 

Starring: Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Rhys Ifans

 

Peter Parker (Garfield) is a social outcast raised by his uncle Ben (Martin Sheen) and aunt May (Sally Field). On a quest to discover the fate of his father (Campbell Scott), Peter learns of Dr. Curt Connors (Ifans) his father’s lab partner. In an attempt to learn from Connors, Peter infiltrates the organisation he works for. But when he is bitten by an experimental spider, Peter gains strange powers and becomes a masked crusader by the name of Spider-Man.

 

The Amazing Spider-Man follows ten years on from the blockbuster Sam Raimi-helmed Spiderman in 2002. However, The Amazing Spider-Man is no sequel (Raimi’s film did indeed have two sequels of its own). It re-establishes the mythology of Spiderman on the silver screen, but doesn’t really revolutionise it or put a new spin on it like Christopher Nolan’s Batman films. As a result, it’s hard for this film to be “amazing”. It’s competent and has a great cast behind it (when does Martin Sheen deliver a bad performance?) even if some parts are a little off-centre (Emma Stone makes a great Gwen Stacy other than I don’t think she can quite pass for seventeen). Where the film succeeds is in its characters. Each have their own backstory and psychology and you build a pretty clear idea of who they are but the actual dialogue is at times poor (and sometimes just factually wrong) and the film doesn’t really stick well in the memory. I’ll admit that I’m no fan of superhero films and if you do like them, this might just be your cup of tea (it certainly isn’t a bad film) but it really depends on your taste on the genre as to how you respond to The Amazing Spider-Man.

 

40.   Total Recall (Dir. Len Wiseman, USA/Canada) (Cert: 12a)

 

Starring: Colin Farrell, Kate Beckinsale, Jessica Biel

 

In the future, the Earth is mostly unpopulated save for two zones. The United Federation Of Britain replacing the United Kingdom and another (known simply as “The Colony”) replacing Australia. Douglas Quaid (Farrell) lives in The Colony and commutes to his job as a welder in the UFB via a process called “The Fall” (a transport that shoots itself through the Earth’s core.) Having been recommended a company called “Rekall”, who specialise in having people live their fantasies through their sub-consciousness. Quaid goes to Rekall, but before he can live out his fantasy of being a secret agent, a raid takes place and Quaid discovers that he may have lived a more dangerous past life.

 

Adapted from Philip K. Dick’s short story, We Remember It For You Wholesale and drawing more so from the story’s previous adaptation, also known as Total Recall, from 1990, this 2012 version keeps faithful to the original Paul Verhoeven film whilst featuring some new elements. What’s new is the depiction of two separate colonies on a ravaged Earth (much of the 1990 film takes place on a Mars colony), but the character names and central conflicts (the existence of Rekall, the war between a government and a militia.) remain somewhat the same. The film also maintains elements from Blade Runner (1982) (also a Philip K. Dick adaptation, this time of Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep?) scenes in The Colony borrow heavily from that film’s look for Los Angeles and the film’s introductory sequence to The Colony is taken almost shot-for-shot from Blade Runner. The film takes itself more seriously than its earlier incarnation, sparing it from the older film’s major error of a seriously over-the-top second half. That being said, this film’s conclusion is far too long and whilst it was nice for the erstwhile Mrs. Quaid (originally played by Sharon Stone, played this time by Kate Beckinsale) has an extended role, the film uses the character a little too much. Not as strong as its forebear, but not the worst sci-fi blockbuster ever made, Total Recall is really a judgement call on how much you want to see it, or Colin Farrell’s continuing struggle with a North American accent.

 

41.   Midnight’s Children (Dir. Deepa Mehta, Canada/UK) (Cert: 12a)

 

Starring: Satya Bhabha, Salman Rushdie, Siddharth

 

In the first hour that signified the independence of India on the 14th of August 1947, hundreds of children were born in India. Of these children, two are born in the same hospital at the same time to connected parents; one (Bhabha, Darsheel Saffary) to a pair of poor parents, the other (Siddharth) to a pair of rich parents.  At birth they are switched as part of a revolutionary gesture, unbeknownst to their parents and live lives on different ends of society. However, they, along with all the others who were born within “the first hour” have magical powers, bringing them into conflict.

 

When it was published in 1981, Midnight’s Children made Indian-born British writer, Salman Rushdie a household name. Given its legacy, a film adaptation was near-inevitable, leading Rushdie to hold a definite grip over this film. He not only wrote the source material, he narrates the film, served as executive producer and wrote the screenplay. As such, in the latter case, Midnight’s Children suffers. Its details are drawn-out and whilst this helps to highlight some gorgeous music and cinematography, it drags the story in between its rare glimpses of greatness. The film does build momentum in the second act, buoyed by more efficient writing and great leading performances, but it’s a case of too little, too late.

 

42.   Anna Karenina (Dir. Joe Wright, UK/France) (Cert: 12a)

 

Starring: Keira Knightley, Jude Law, Aaron Taylor-Johnson

 

In the closing days of the Russian Empire, well-to-do socialite, Anna (Knightley) happens to have a chance-encounter with the Count Vronsky (Taylor-Johnson) and embark on a whirlwind affair with him, tearing apart her marriage to politician, Alexei Karenin (Law) in the process. Meanwhile, a farm-labourer (Doomhall Gleeson) whose father used to own the farm falls in love with a wealthy society girl (Alicia Vikander).

 

After previously having Keira Knightley star in such films as Atonement (2007) and Pride And Prejudice (2005), this time director Joe Wright puts her as the lead in this adaptation of the classic Leo Tolstoy literary epic. With Joe Wright’s previous work of historical (and very British) bombast lending some comparisons with Sir David Lean, Anna Karenina could be seen as Wright’s equivalent to Doctor Zhivago (1965) and some of the panoramic shots of snow-covered Russian tundra certainly pay credence to this, however its structure lies mostly on the purely theatrical side (keeping in mind that playwright Tom Stoppard wrote the screenplay adaption of Karenina) to a literal degree with the film frequently taking the guise of a stage-play (although parts play out in the rafters and wings as well). Original and unique, yes, but also bewildering and more than a little pretentious. One can’t help but think that if Wright had actually gone the more conventional route than this film with often beautiful imagery and fine performances would’ve been much better.

 

43.   Snow White And The Huntsman Dir. Rupert Sanders, USA) (Cert: 12)

 

Starring: Kristen Stewart, Chris Hemsworth, Charlize Theron

 

In this darker take on the classic tale, Snow White (Stewart) manages to escape from the capitivity of an evil and vain queen (Theron), who sends a huntsman (Hemsworth) out to kill Snow White. However, when Snow White helps the Huntsman have change in heart, they decide to take on the queen.

 

Snow White & The Huntsman builds on an interesting idea. It’s no secret that fairy tales, despite being told mainly to young children, are often very dark and here, we don’t get Walt Disney, rather a fairly grim (no pun intended) take on the tale with Tolkienian slant. Kristen Stewart, pale skin, dark hair and sullen expression is a good fit for this interpretation and delivers a solid performance. However, the film can’t resist the dark for too long and it’s clear that it’s also trying to play to a softer audience than it should. What the film needed was less compromise and for it to actually rest on its convictions as a dark fairy tale; then it would’ve been interesting. As it is, it’s a little disappointing.

 

44.   The Lorax (Dirs. Ryan Balda, Chris Renauld, USA) (Cert: U)

 

Starring: Zack Efron, Ed Helms, Danny DeVito

 

Thneedville is a happy place where everyone is perfectly contented with their lives, living off the completely inorganic resources that have been made for them. However, a girl named Audrey (Taylor Swift) is obsessed with these now-long-gone things known as  trees and paints a mural to them on the side of her house. In an effort to win Audrey’s heart, a young boy named Ted Wiggins (Efron) goes in search of the Once-ler (Helms) who holds the knowledge about the trees, so that Ted can get one of his own.

 

Coming from the team behind the particularly strong Despicable Me (2010), you could make high expectations for The Lorax, even though history has been rather chequered with bringing the stories of Dr Suess to the big screen. Here the rather short nature of the late Dr Suess’ stories shows rather clearly as the film struggles to get to grips with the story, turning what should be a small set-up into the main crux of the film and overblowing many sequences. While the animation is pleasing enough and there are a few good jokes here and there, the music is mostly forgettable bubblegum pop (which pretty much completely misses a great chance for ironic interpretation) and the film ends up being mostly a disappointment. 

 

45.   The Campaign Dir. Jay Roach, USA) (Cert: 15)

 

Starring: Will Ferrell, Zac Galifianackis, Sarah Baker

 

With the Congressional elections for North Carolina on the horizon, the unopposed election seems to look like a cakewalk for sitting congressman Cam Brady (Ferrell). That is until two businessmen brothers (Dan Akyroyd, Jon Lithgow) put forward an opponent in the soft-natured Marty Hugggins (Galifianackis) and the race is on.

 

Released in the approach to the 2012 presidential election, The Campaign focuses on the congressional rather than on the presidential. It would seem that elections would be a good target for comedy that is unexplored beyond the focus away from the actual process (eg: Election (1999) or Man Of The Year (2006)) and so it’s rather promising if say, the story was used to satirise stereotypes of the political left and right. Perhaps in an effort to play it safe given the real-life political backdrop, the film doesn’t pick sides (which is good) but instead just becomes a comedy of childish insults (which is very, very bad). Though Ferrell plays a Democrat and Huggins a Republican, their actual affiliations are meaningless and are pushed aside for crude jokes. Both the stars and supporting players such as Dan Akyroyd and Jon Lithgow are worth more than this rather disappointing film.