Starring: Leonardo DiCaprio, Tobey Maguire, Carey Mulligan
Nick Carraway (Maguire), a Mid-Westerner working on Wall
Street goes to stay with his wealthy cousin Daisy (Mulligan) and her husband,
Tom (Joel Edgerton). Shortly after arriving, Nick receives an invitation to a
party held by the mythically wealthy and enigmatic J. Gatsby (DiCaprio). Nick
soon becomes part of Gatsby’s world but when it’s revealed that Daisy and
Gatsby had a whirlwind romance five years earlier, their lives spin out of
control.
Director Baz Luhrmann has a way with film-making. His
characteristic flamboyance and theatricality has previously served to adapt
Shakespeare to the big screen with Romeo + Juliet (1996) and now, reuniting
with his Romeo in Leonardo DiCaprio, Luhrmann turns his attention to arguably
the great novel of the 20th Century, F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great
Gatsby. As the title suggests, it is DiCaprio’s performance of J. Gatsby that
really supports the entire piece for good or ill. The Gatsby character is an
intriguing presence that doesn’t fail to be fascinating and is illuminated by
DiCaprio’s charismatic presence. It does however take a while for him to come on screen and the
opening preamble towards this is noticeably limp; Luhrmann’s foibles and
follies over-powering the atmosphere. Even the party sequences are a little
over-stylised, utilising contemporary music to demonstrate decadence. It isn’t
the first time such an idea has been utilised. Luhrmann himself made it the
cornerstone of Moulin Rouge! (2000) and other examples range from BackBeat (1994)
to Marie Antoinette (2006). The thing is, the 1920s was a decadent time
already. Drug abuse was rampant in the party scene, people held parties of sex
and debauchery and, generally, hedonism ruled every bit as much as it does now.
Giving the film more realism will give it more dramatic weight. When the film
becomes more faithful to the period it is a special film and it is visually
gorgeous at times (even if the 3D seems an oddly inappropriate choice) but the
whole product feels a little too Luhrmann-ised. However, as a result, if you
liked Luhrmann’s early works, there won’t be much here to dislike.
No comments:
Post a Comment