Wednesday, 4 February 2015

Mortdecai (2015, Dir. David Koepp, USA) (Cert: 12a/R) **

The whole spy parody subgenre has had a troubled history and as of late there are two rival films on general release that are seemingly competing to win out at the box office. One is Kingsman: The Secret Service (2014), Matthew Vaughan’s Bond-influenced spies-in-training blockbuster that combines traits of two of Vaughan’s earlier films (you can sort of look at this film as Kick-Ass (2010) meets X-Men: First Class (2011) albeit with spies replacing superheroes) and the other new film by screenwriter/director David Koepp (Jurassic Park (1993) is probably his most beloved screenplay), Mortdecai, is an film adaptation for the character created by writer Kyril Bonfiglioli. Kingsman is a decent film. Decent not great. It also seems set to be a big hit. Mortdecai…well…

As I mentioned at the start, spy parodies haven’t always worked. Most of them, in my experience, are rather poor. Even the Austin Powers films, whilst having some value, eventually outstayed their welcome and whether it’s the 1967 version of Casino Royale with David Niven, Spy Hard (1996) or the more recent Johnny English films, parodies of spy films…well, they just don’t work very well a great deal of the time. You could attribute this to a few reasons. One being that spy films have, in the past, stretched things to unbelievable proportions that playing them off for laughs seems completely redundant, such as with Moonraker (1979) which was probably never meant to be taken seriously in the first place. Another problem is the lack of imagination that’s often involved. Everyone knows the tropes. You usually have a suave, sophisticated and attractive hero, ostensibly a James Bond figure. There’s the colourful, charismatic and megalomaniacal villain. There’s the glamorous love interest, often a dangerous femme fatale. Most spy parodies check these off in some fashion and it understandably becomes tiresome very quickly. Then there’s the simplest explanation. That they’re just not funny enough.

Mortdecai sort of hits all three of those problems. Charlie Mortdecai is no James Bond. Bond doesn’t really figure into it when you compare the two characters, save for Niven’s take on the role. But he’s a parody of the other gentleman spies that belong to an older world. Johnny Depp’s performance is itself a collage of caricatures of many other performers. A dash of David Niven, a touch of Terry Thomas, a pinch of Peter Sellers, a rinse of Rowan Atkinson and so on. One of Johnny Depp’s greatest facilities as an actor is his charisma and that he can also be a very transformative actor, able to turn his own unique style to a number of guises. Here, he does that, but it’s not original and his cod accent seems to call to mind Captain Jack Sparrow if he was a country lord. Fellow American Gwyneth Paltrow also turns on the British accent as Mortdecai’s wife and she fares better for it but there’s a feeling that she’s not giving it her all.

Ewan McGregor, who has a capacity to incorporate the styles of different actors into his own style (his turn as Obi-Wan Kenobi  in the Star Wars prequels did have a rather faithful touch of Alec Guinness to it) but as Charlie’s superior, who also carries a torch for Gwyneth Paltrow, he sometimes lunges into a complete Roger Moore impersonation and not letting his own abilities shine through as he has done in earlier films such as Haywire (2011) whilst Olivia Munn doesn’t make much of an impact (admittedly more a fault of the fact that she doesn’t have much screen time) but is effectively a re-tread of Tia Carrere’s role in True Lies (1994). In fact, the only actor in the entire film that I felt rather drawn to was Paul Bettany as Mortdecai’s manservant, Jock which Bettany imbues with a nice mix of stone-faced seriousness and comic ability.

For whatever reason you can give to the performances, it must be stated that it doesn’t work as a comedy because it’s simply not that funny. Thankfully, it doesn’t resort to the worst of toilet humour but the main problem of the film is that it keeps running with the same old gag that wasn’t even funny at the start. The principal runner is Mortdecai’s obsessive enthusiasm for his newly-grown moustache, which everyone despises, especially Mrs. Mortdecai who gags at trying to kiss her husband because of it (in turn he then gags due to a sympathetic reflex). This joke is used a lot. Some small chuckles may be had from some of the gags but this far from the best possible material.


Given the popularity of the original Mortdecai books, you could be forgiven for thinking that this had potential. A sort of spy story enthused with very British class-based comedy of P.G Wodehouse for example probably would have the potential for something enjoyable. The issue is not so much the concept (even if it’s not very original) but more its execution. With some better gags and better performances, Mortdecai could’ve been a better film, even a very good film. There’s just a feeling that what’s there simply isn’t good enough.  

No comments:

Post a Comment